No need for Senate approval for increased presence of US troops
The Senate does not need to approve the proposal for increased presence of American troops in the Philippines, a Palace official said Monday.
Quoting officials from the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA), presidential spokesperson Edwin Lacierda said congressional approval is no longer necessary since the framework for the temporary presence of the US forces in the country "will be done within the framework of the Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA)."
"There is no need for Senate ratification. However, for purposes of transparency the panel will be briefing congressional leaders on the status of the negotiations," Lacierda said.
At a press conference earlier in the day, Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin announced that negotiations between the Philippines and US governments on a larger presence of American troops in the country will start this week.
The 1987 Constitution states that "foreign military bases, troops, or facilities shall not be allowed in the Philippines except under a treaty duly concurred in by the Senate."
In 1991, the Philippine Senate voted to expel US military bases from the country by a historic 12-11 vote. Eight years later, the Senate ratified the VFA between the US and the Philippines.
The VFA is a bilateral agreement which specifies how the Philippines and the US will determine jurisdiction of an American soldier involved in a crime committed on Philippine soil.
Senate President Franklin Drilon, for his part, meanwhile said that his chamber will definitely call the attention of the executive department if the framework agreement becomes a basing deal.
"If it is a basing agreement, we will call them [executive officials] to task. They know the boundaries of the Constitution. When working on this framework agreement, they should consider these boundaries," Drilon said in a separate interview.
'Big deal out of nothing'
Senator Antonio Trillanes IV, for his part, expressed fears that the "hype" being given the proposed rotational presence of US troops in the country may further sour the Philippines' ties with China.
REad More: http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/321650/news/nation/palace-no-need-for-senate-approval-for-increased-presence-of-us-troops-in-phl
Quoting officials from the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA), presidential spokesperson Edwin Lacierda said congressional approval is no longer necessary since the framework for the temporary presence of the US forces in the country "will be done within the framework of the Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA)."
"There is no need for Senate ratification. However, for purposes of transparency the panel will be briefing congressional leaders on the status of the negotiations," Lacierda said.
At a press conference earlier in the day, Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin announced that negotiations between the Philippines and US governments on a larger presence of American troops in the country will start this week.
The 1987 Constitution states that "foreign military bases, troops, or facilities shall not be allowed in the Philippines except under a treaty duly concurred in by the Senate."
In 1991, the Philippine Senate voted to expel US military bases from the country by a historic 12-11 vote. Eight years later, the Senate ratified the VFA between the US and the Philippines.
The VFA is a bilateral agreement which specifies how the Philippines and the US will determine jurisdiction of an American soldier involved in a crime committed on Philippine soil.
Senate President Franklin Drilon, for his part, meanwhile said that his chamber will definitely call the attention of the executive department if the framework agreement becomes a basing deal.
"If it is a basing agreement, we will call them [executive officials] to task. They know the boundaries of the Constitution. When working on this framework agreement, they should consider these boundaries," Drilon said in a separate interview.
'Big deal out of nothing'
Senator Antonio Trillanes IV, for his part, expressed fears that the "hype" being given the proposed rotational presence of US troops in the country may further sour the Philippines' ties with China.
REad More: http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/321650/news/nation/palace-no-need-for-senate-approval-for-increased-presence-of-us-troops-in-phl
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(Atom)
Search
Articles :
Popular Posts
-
U.S. Navy warships in 2014 there will be a large number of retired, sold, of which the Philippines could become 7 Used Perry class frigates...
-
The third US warship to visit the Philippines in three weeks is arriving Tuesday in Subic, Zambales province, a sign of unchanged relations ...
-
MANILA, Philippines - The Philippines has increased the number of troops deployed on five islets, two sand bars and two reefs that it claim...
-
Some 40 students and teachers from Taiwan will go on a camping trip to the disputed Spratly Islands, Taiwan's Central News Agency report...
-
MANILA, Philippines — Amid long-running tension between Manila and Beijing over the hotly-contested West Philippine Sea (South China Sea), D...
-
Everyone looks extra sharp in our whites because today marks the first official activity of BRP Ramon Alcaraz (PF16) in the Philippine terri...
-
Less than 30 percent of air assets of the Philippine Air Force are currently operational, a senior PAF official said even as he underscored ...
-
In Tom Clancy’s world of fiction, it’s a US nuclear submarine that fights China over the disputed Spratly Islands in the West Philippine Se...
-
MANILA, Philippines - Salvaging operations for the USS Guardian began yesterday after the Tubbataha Protected Area Management Board (TPAMB) ...
-
Taiwan, one of the six claimants to the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea (West Philippine Sea) has launched a mobile telecommunication...
0 comments:
Post a Comment